CPU
GPU
GeForce Go 7400
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7400 is positioned at rank 310 and the MOBILITY RADEON X700 is on rank 717, so the GeForce Go 7400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7400
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce Go 7400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7400 and MOBILITY RADEON X700
GeForce Go 7400
The GeForce Go 7400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points. Launch price was $89.
MOBILITY RADEON X700
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7400 scores 66 and the MOBILITY RADEON X700 reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7400 is built on Kepler while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7400) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7400) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X700).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 66 | 67+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+47% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 80 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7400 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 has 128 MB. The GeForce Go 7400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7400) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7400 draws 64W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 50W — a 24.6% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7400) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 50W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7400 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7400 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $20 |
| Codename | GK107 | Broadway |
| Release | May 29 2014 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #777 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 7400 and MOBILITY RADEON X700
