
Radeon X550XTX vs RADEON X600 PRO

Radeon X550XTX
Popular choices:

RADEON X600 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X550XTX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X600 PRO.
| Insight | Radeon X550XTX | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X600 PRO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $49 for the Radeon X550XTX, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 362.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X550XTX | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+362.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X550XTX and RADEON X600 PRO

Radeon X550XTX
The Radeon X550XTX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X550XTX scores 71 versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 67 — the Radeon X550XTX leads by 6%. The Radeon X550XTX is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon X550XTX) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon X550XTX) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 71+6% | 67 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 6.39 TFLOPS+412% |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 1560 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon X550XTX) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X550XTX draws 50W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon X550XTX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X550XTX) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 170mm |
| Height | — | 65mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+250% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X550XTX launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99 and now averages $10. The RADEON X600 PRO costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (Radeon X550XTX) vs 6.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO offers 378.6% better value. The RADEON X600 PRO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon X550XTX | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $10-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 6.7+379% |
| Codename | Lexa | Navi 10 |
| Release | March 27 2019 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #772 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















