Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON X600 PRO

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON X600 PRO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON X600 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$99 MSRP

RADEON X600 PRO

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X600 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X600 PRO is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (67 vs 66), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X600 PRO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X600 PRO makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.5% (0.7 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON X600 PRO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.

RADEON X600 PRO

The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 scores 66 and the RADEON X600 PRO reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	RADEON X600 PRO
G3D Mark Score	66	67+2%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	800	2048+156%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	6.39 TFLOPS+471%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	128+220%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	3 MB+1100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	RADEON X600 PRO
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	RADEON X600 PRO
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	3 MB+1100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 draws 50W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 100% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	RADEON X600 PRO
TDP	50W-67%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	65mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	1.3+225%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 came in at $100, while the RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99. On MSRP, RADEON X600 PRO was 1% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 0.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X600 PRO (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP	$100	$99-1%
Performance per Dollar	0.7	0.7
Codename	Broadway	Navi 10
Release	January 7 2010	January 21 2020
Ranking	#846	#216

Search Mobility Radeon HD 4225 on Amazon

Search RADEON X600 PRO on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.