GeForce Go 6600 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6600

2012Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 6600 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6600 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6600

2012

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 180% higher power demand at 140W vs 50W.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 140W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 6600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.5% in PassMark G3D (69 vs 66), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 6600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4225 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 6600 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 6600 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6600

The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 6600 scores 69 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 reaches 66 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6600 is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce Go 6600) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4225).

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Mobility Radeon HD 4225
G3D Mark Score
69+5%
66
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
960+20%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.981 TFLOPS+77%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
80+100%
40
L1 Cache
80 KB
80 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Mobility Radeon HD 4225
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6600 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 carries 512 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4225 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6600 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4225. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce Go 6600) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) — the GeForce Go 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Mobility Radeon HD 4225
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6600 draws 140W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4225's 50W — a 94.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6600) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Mobility Radeon HD 4225
TDP
140W
50W-64%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
0.5
1.3+160%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 6600 (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Mobility Radeon HD 4225
MSRP
$100
Codename
GK106
Broadway
Release
September 6 2012
January 7 2010
Ranking
#490
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.