GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X700 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6600

2012Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON X700 SE

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X700 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X700 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X700 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6600

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 86.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 75W.

RADEON X700 SE

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 75W instead of 140W, a 65W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON X700 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (71 vs 69), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X700 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON X700 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X700 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6600

The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

RADEON X700 SE

The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 6600 scores 69 and the RADEON X700 SE reaches 71 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6600 is built on Kepler while the RADEON X700 SE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce Go 6600) vs 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600) vs 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600RADEON X700 SE
G3D Mark Score
69
71+3%
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
960
1792+87%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.981 TFLOPS
15.77 TFLOPS+696%
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
2200 MHz+113%
ROPs
24
64+167%
TMUs
80
112+40%
L1 Cache
80 KB
512 KB+540%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X700 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600RADEON X700 SE
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6600 and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 SE. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce Go 6600) vs 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) — the RADEON X700 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600RADEON X700 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6600 draws 140W versus the RADEON X700 SE's 75W — a 60.5% difference. The RADEON X700 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6600) vs 350W (RADEON X700 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600RADEON X700 SE
TDP
140W
75W-46%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
0.5
0.9+80%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON X700 SE (2023 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce Go 6600RADEON X700 SE
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK106
Navi 33
Release
September 6 2012
January 4 2023
Ranking
#490
#139

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.