GeForce Go 6600 vs Radeon HD 2350
GeForce Go 6600
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 2350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6600 is positioned at rank 280 and the Radeon HD 2350 is on rank 322, so the GeForce Go 6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 2350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 2350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 6600.
| Insight | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 2350 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6600 and Radeon HD 2350
GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.
Radeon HD 2350
The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6600 scores 69 versus the Radeon HD 2350's 77 — the Radeon HD 2350 leads by 11.6%. The GeForce Go 6600 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 2350 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce Go 6600) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 69 | 77+12% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 1792+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.981 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1250 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 448 KB+460% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 768 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6600 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2350 has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 2350 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce Go 6600) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 2350) — the Radeon HD 2350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 768 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6600 draws 140W versus the Radeon HD 2350's 200W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce Go 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6600) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-30% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+25% | 0.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 6600 and Radeon HD 2350
