GeForce Go 6600 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700
GeForce Go 6600
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6600 is positioned at rank 280 and the MOBILITY RADEON X700 is on rank 717, so the GeForce Go 6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6600
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON X700.
| Insight | GeForce Go 6600 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6600 and MOBILITY RADEON X700
GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.
MOBILITY RADEON X700
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 6600 scores 69 and the MOBILITY RADEON X700 reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6600 is built on Kepler while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce Go 6600) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X700).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 69+3% | 67 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+20% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.981 TFLOPS+77% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 128 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce Go 6600) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X700) — the GeForce Go 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 6600) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6600 draws 140W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 50W — a 94.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6600) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 50W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.3+160% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 6600 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $20 |
| Codename | GK106 | Broadway |
| Release | September 6 2012 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #490 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 6600 and MOBILITY RADEON X700
