GeForce Go 6600 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6600 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6600 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6600

2012

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌180% higher power demand at 140W vs 50W.

MOBILITY RADEON X700

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 140W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce Go 6600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (69 vs 67), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce Go 6600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON X700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON X700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 6600 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 6600 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6600

The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.

MOBILITY RADEON X700

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 6600 scores 69 and the MOBILITY RADEON X700 reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6600 is built on Kepler while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce Go 6600) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X700).

Feature	GeForce Go 6600	MOBILITY RADEON X700
G3D Mark Score	69+3%	67
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	960+20%	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.981 TFLOPS+77%	1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L1 Cache	80 KB	80 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce Go 6600	MOBILITY RADEON X700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6600 and 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce Go 6600) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X700) — the GeForce Go 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 6600	MOBILITY RADEON X700
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 6600) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce Go 6600	MOBILITY RADEON X700
DirectX	9.0c	9.0b
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6600 draws 140W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700's 50W — a 94.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6600) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce Go 6600	MOBILITY RADEON X700
TDP	140W	50W-64%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	0.5	1.3+160%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 6600 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce Go 6600	MOBILITY RADEON X700
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	GK106	Broadway
Release	September 6 2012	January 7 2010
Ranking	#490	#846

Search GeForce Go 6600 on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON X700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.