
GeForce Go 6600 vs Radeon X1550

GeForce Go 6600
Popular choices:

Radeon X1550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce Go 6600 is positioned at rank #280 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6600
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1550 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6600 and Radeon X1550

GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon X1550
The Radeon X1550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 6600 scores 69 and the Radeon X1550 reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6600 is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce Go 6600) vs 512 (Radeon X1550). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1550). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 69+3% | 67 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+88% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.981 TFLOPS+64% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1183 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6600 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1550 has 512 MB. The Radeon X1550 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce Go 6600) vs 256 KB (Radeon X1550) — the GeForce Go 6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 6600) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 6600) vs Avivo (Radeon X1550). Decoder: VP1 vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | Avivo |
| Decoder | VP1 | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6600 draws 140W versus the Radeon X1550's 50W — a 94.7% difference. The Radeon X1550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6600) vs 350W (Radeon X1550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W | 50W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.3+160% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | Radeon X1550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | GK106 | Lexa |
| Release | September 6 2012 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #490 | #668 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















