GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce Go 6600
Popular choices:
RADEON X600 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6600 is positioned at rank 280 and the RADEON X600 PRO is on rank 341, so the GeForce Go 6600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6600
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X600 PRO is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The RADEON X600 PRO likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 6600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X600 PRO offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6600 and RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.
RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 6600 scores 69 and the RADEON X600 PRO reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6600 is built on Kepler while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce Go 6600) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 69+3% | 67 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 2048+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.981 TFLOPS | 6.39 TFLOPS+223% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1560 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 3 MB+689% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6600 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 PRO has 512 MB. The RADEON X600 PRO offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce Go 6600) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 3 MB+689% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 6600) vs None (RADEON X600 PRO). Decoder: VP1 vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce Go 6600) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | VP1 | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6600 draws 140W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce Go 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6600) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-7% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 65mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+25% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600 PRO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GK106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | September 6 2012 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #490 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 6600 and RADEON X600 PRO
