
GeForce Go 6600

RADEON X600 PRO
GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X600 PRO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X600 PRO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X600 PRO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 6600
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
RADEON X600 PRO
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅GeForce Go 6600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON X600 PRO is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 6600 vs RADEON X600 PRO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6600
The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.

RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 6600 scores 69 and the RADEON X600 PRO reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 6600 is built on Kepler while the RADEON X600 PRO uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce Go 6600) vs 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 69+3% | 67 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 2048+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.981 TFLOPS | 6.39 TFLOPS+223% |
| Boost Clock | 1033 MHz | 1560 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 3 MB+689% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 6600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X600 PRO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6600 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 PRO carries 512 MB. RADEON X600 PRO gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6600 and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 PRO. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce Go 6600) vs 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 3 MB+689% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 6600) vs None (RADEON X600 PRO). Decoder: VP1 vs MPEG-2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce Go 6600) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (RADEON X600 PRO).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | VP1 | MPEG-2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6600 draws 140W versus the RADEON X600 PRO's 150W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce Go 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6600) vs 350W (RADEON X600 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-7% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 65mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5+25% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RADEON X600 PRO (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6600 | RADEON X600 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Codename | GK106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | September 6 2012 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #490 | #216 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














