GeForce Go 6600 vs Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6600

2012Core: 980 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1650 GTO

2022Core: 1925 MHzBoost: 2324 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 6600 vs Radeon X1650 GTO Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6600 vs Radeon X1650 GTO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6600 vs Radeon X1650 GTO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6600

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 140W instead of 335W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (69 vs 75).
  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon X1650 GTO

2022

Why buy it

  • +8.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • GeForce Go 6600 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1650 GTO is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 139.3% higher power demand at 335W vs 140W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1650 GTO is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.7% in PassMark G3D (75 vs 69), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1650 GTO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1650 GTO makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 6600 vs Radeon X1650 GTO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6600

The GeForce Go 6600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

Radeon X1650 GTO

The Radeon X1650 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 75 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6600 scores 69 versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 75 — the Radeon X1650 GTO leads by 8.7%. The GeForce Go 6600 is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1650 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce Go 6600) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1650 GTO). Raw compute: 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6600) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1650 GTO). Boost clocks: 1033 MHz vs 2324 MHz.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Radeon X1650 GTO
G3D Mark Score
69
75+9%
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
960
5120+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.981 TFLOPS
23.8 TFLOPS+1101%
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
2324 MHz+125%
ROPs
24
128+433%
TMUs
80
320+300%
L1 Cache
0.08 MB
1 MB+1150%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
4 MB+953%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6600 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1650 GTO leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Radeon X1650 GTO
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6600 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 GTO carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 GTO gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6600 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 GTO. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce Go 6600) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the Radeon X1650 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Radeon X1650 GTO
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
4 MB+953%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6600 draws 140W versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 335W — a 82.1% difference. The GeForce Go 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6600) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 GTO). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Radeon X1650 GTO
TDP
140W-58%
335W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
0.5+150%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1650 GTO (2022 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce Go 6600Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP
$150
Codename
GK106
Navi 21
Release
September 6 2012
May 10 2022
Ranking
#490
#25

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.