GeForce 8400 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400 SE

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 106.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 8400 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (68 vs 66), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8400 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8400 SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 106.1% (1.4 vs 0.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 8400 SE vs Mobility Radeon HD 4225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400 SE

The GeForce 8400 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 68 points.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400 SE scores 68 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 reaches 66 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400 SE is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4225).

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	Mobility Radeon HD 4225
G3D Mark Score	68+3%	66
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+30%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	40+150%
L1 Cache	192 KB+140%	80 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8400 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	Mobility Radeon HD 4225
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 SE and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4225. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) — the GeForce 8400 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	Mobility Radeon HD 4225
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 SE draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4225's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8400 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	Mobility Radeon HD 4225
TDP	33W-34%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	2.1+62%	1.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8400 SE came in at $50, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 8400 SE was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GeForce 8400 SE) vs 0.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) — the GeForce 8400 SE offers 100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400 SE (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce 8400 SE	Mobility Radeon HD 4225
MSRP	$50-50%	$100
Performance per Dollar	1.4+100%	0.7
Codename	GM108	Broadway
Release	March 17 2014	January 7 2010
Ranking	#850	#846

Search GeForce 8400 SE on Amazon

Search Mobility Radeon HD 4225 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.