Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs Radeon X1650 SE
Mobility Radeon HD 4225
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is positioned at rank #718 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4225
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1650 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The Radeon X1650 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1650 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 4225.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 203.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+203.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 4225 and Radeon X1650 SE
Mobility Radeon HD 4225
The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.
Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 scores 66 versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 71 — the Radeon X1650 SE leads by 7.6%. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 66 | 71+8% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2560+220% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 160+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-80% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3+333% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 offers 214.3% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 4225 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.4+214% | 1.4 |
| Codename | Broadway | Navi 22 |
| Release | January 7 2010 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #846 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 4225 and Radeon X1650 SE
