Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs Radeon X1650 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs Radeon X1650 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs Radeon X1650 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1650 SE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1650 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 7.6% in PassMark G3D (71 vs 66), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1650 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1650 SE has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs Radeon X1650 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.

Radeon X1650 SE

The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 scores 66 versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 71 — the Radeon X1650 SE leads by 7.6%. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	Radeon X1650 SE
G3D Mark Score	66	71+8%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	800	2560+220%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	160+300%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	Radeon X1650 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 SE.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	Radeon X1650 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	Radeon X1650 SE
TDP	50W-80%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	1.3+333%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 came in at $100, while the Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 SE was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs Infinity (Radeon X1650 SE) — the Radeon X1650 SE offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 SE (2023 vs 2010).

Feature	Mobility Radeon HD 4225	Radeon X1650 SE
MSRP	$100	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.7	Infinity
Codename	Broadway	Navi 22
Release	January 7 2010	October 17 2023
Ranking	#846	#92

Search Mobility Radeon HD 4225 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1650 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.