Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON X700 SE

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON X700 SE

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON X700 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON X700 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON X700 SE

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RADEON X700 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 7.6% in PassMark G3D (71 vs 66), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RADEON X700 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 40nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 4225 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON X700 SE has the stronger long-term case.

Mobility Radeon HD 4225 vs RADEON X700 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 4225

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 66 points.

AMD

RADEON X700 SE

The RADEON X700 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 scores 66 versus the RADEON X700 SE's 71 — the RADEON X700 SE leads by 7.6%. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON X700 SE uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 1,792 (RADEON X700 SE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 15.77 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 SE).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON X700 SE
G3D Mark Score
66
71+8%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
800
1792+124%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
15.77 TFLOPS+1308%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
112+180%
L1 Cache
80 KB
512 KB+540%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON X700 SE
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 SE carries 128 MB. Mobility Radeon HD 4225 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 and 64-bit on the RADEON X700 SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 2 MB (RADEON X700 SE) — the RADEON X700 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON X700 SE
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+300%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 draws 50W versus the RADEON X700 SE's 75W — a 40% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4225 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs 350W (RADEON X700 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON X700 SE
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Perf/Watt
1.3+44%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Mobility Radeon HD 4225 came in at $100, while the RADEON X700 SE launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON X700 SE was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.7 (Mobility Radeon HD 4225) vs Infinity (RADEON X700 SE) — the RADEON X700 SE offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X700 SE (2023 vs 2010).

FeatureMobility Radeon HD 4225RADEON X700 SE
MSRP
$100
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.7
Infinity
Codename
Broadway
Navi 33
Release
January 7 2010
January 4 2023
Ranking
#846
#139

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.