
RADEON X600 PRO
Popular choices:

RADEON X800 XL
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X600 PRO is positioned at rank 341 and the RADEON X800 XL is on rank 368, so the RADEON X600 PRO offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 PRO
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 XL
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 XL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X600 PRO offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X600 PRO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $15 for the RADEON X800 XL, it costs 33% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 45.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+45.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600 PRO and RADEON X800 XL

RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.

RADEON X800 XL
The RADEON X800 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2250 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 69 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X600 PRO scores 67 and the RADEON X800 XL reaches 69 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X600 PRO is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON X800 XL uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 4,608 (RADEON X800 XL). Raw compute: 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 20.74 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 XL). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2250 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67 | 69+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4608+125% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.39 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS+225% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2250 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 288+125% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X600 PRO comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X800 XL has 256 MB. The RADEON X600 PRO offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 XL) — the RADEON X800 XL has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X600 PRO draws 150W versus the RADEON X800 XL's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The RADEON X600 PRO is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 350W (RADEON X800 XL). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-50% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 65mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+100% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the RADEON X800 XL launched at $349 and now averages $15. The RADEON X600 PRO costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 4.6 (RADEON X800 XL) — the RADEON X600 PRO offers 45.7% better value.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | RADEON X800 XL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-72% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-33% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7+46% | 4.6 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 21 2020 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #216 | #42 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















