
RADEON X700

Radeon X1650 SE
RADEON X700 vs Radeon X1650 SE Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON X700 vs Radeon X1650 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON X700 vs Radeon X1650 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON X700
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 250W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon X1650 SE
2023Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 175W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON X700 vs Radeon X1650 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON X700
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.

Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X700 scores 73 and the Radeon X1650 SE reaches 71 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X700 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (RADEON X700) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE). Boost clocks: 2450 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 73+3% | 71 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Boost Clock | 2450 MHz | 2581 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 SE carries 512 MB. Radeon X1650 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON X700 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 SE.
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 draws 175W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 35.3% difference. The RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-30% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON X700 came in at $149, while the Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 SE was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (RADEON X700) vs Infinity (Radeon X1650 SE) — the Radeon X1650 SE offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 SE (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Navi 22 | Navi 22 |
| Release | June 9 2021 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #90 | #92 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














