CPU
GPU
RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Radeon X1650 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X700 is positioned at rank #354 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon X1650 SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $49 for the Radeon X1650 SE, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 403.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+403.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X700 and Radeon X1650 SE
RADEON X700
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Radeon X1650 SE
The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X700 scores 73 and the Radeon X1650 SE reaches 71 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X700 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (RADEON X700) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE). Boost clocks: 2450 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 73+3% | 71 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Boost Clock | 2450 MHz | 2581 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X700 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1650 SE has 512 MB. The Radeon X1650 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X700 draws 175W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 35.3% difference. The RADEON X700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X700) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-30% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X700 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0 and now averages $49. The RADEON X700 costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.3 (RADEON X700) vs 1.4 (Radeon X1650 SE) — the RADEON X700 offers 421.4% better value. The Radeon X1650 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | RADEON X700 | Radeon X1650 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.3+421% | 1.4 |
| Codename | Navi 22 | Navi 22 |
| Release | June 9 2021 | October 17 2023 |
| Ranking | #90 | #92 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X700 and Radeon X1650 SE
