
Radeon 3100 vs RADEON X700

Radeon 3100
Popular choices:

RADEON X700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 3100 is positioned at rank 727 and the RADEON X700 is on rank 354, so the RADEON X700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3100
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 3100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700.
| Insight | Radeon 3100 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $10 versus $30 for the Radeon 3100, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 195.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 3100 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+195.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3100 and RADEON X700

Radeon 3100
The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

RADEON X700
The RADEON X700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 73 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 3100 scores 74 and the RADEON X700 reaches 73 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RADEON X700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3100) vs 2,304 (RADEON X700). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (RADEON X700). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 2450 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 74+1% | 73 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2304+350% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 11.29 TFLOPS+805% |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 2450 MHz+101% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 144+350% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 3100 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 has 256 MB. The Radeon 3100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon 3100) vs 3 MB (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 3100 draws 50W versus the RADEON X700's 175W — a 111.1% difference. The Radeon 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3100) vs 350W (RADEON X700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-71% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5+275% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 3100 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the RADEON X700 launched at $149 and now averages $10. The RADEON X700 costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.5 (Radeon 3100) vs 7.3 (RADEON X700) — the RADEON X700 offers 192% better value. The RADEON X700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | RADEON X700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $149-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $10-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 7.3+192% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Navi 22 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #757 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















