Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 GTO

AMD

Radeon 3100

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon X1650 GTO

2022Core: 1925 MHzBoost: 2324 MHz

Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 GTO Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 GTO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 GTO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 3100

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 335W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon X1650 GTO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 32.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon X1650 GTO

2022

Why buy it

  • 1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 34.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Radeon 3100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon X1650 GTO is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 570% higher power demand at 335W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1650 GTO is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (75 vs 74), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1650 GTO is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 80 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1650 GTO makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 34.5% (0.5 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 GTO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 3100

The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

AMD

Radeon X1650 GTO

The Radeon X1650 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 75 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 3100 scores 74 and the Radeon X1650 GTO reaches 75 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1650 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3100) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1650 GTO). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1650 GTO). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 2324 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 3100Radeon X1650 GTO
G3D Mark Score
74
75+1%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
512
5120+900%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.247 TFLOPS
23.8 TFLOPS+1809%
Boost Clock
1218 MHz
2324 MHz+91%
ROPs
16
128+700%
TMUs
32
320+900%
L1 Cache
0.13 MB
1 MB+669%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 3100Radeon X1650 GTO
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 3100 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 GTO. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon 3100) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the Radeon X1650 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 3100Radeon X1650 GTO
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 3100 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 335W — a 148.1% difference. The Radeon 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3100) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 GTO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 3100Radeon X1650 GTO
TDP
50W-85%
335W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
1.5+650%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 3100 came in at $199, while the Radeon X1650 GTO launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 GTO was 24.6% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Radeon 3100) vs 0.5 (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the Radeon X1650 GTO offers 25% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 GTO (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon 3100Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP
$199
$150-25%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
0.5+25%
Codename
Polaris 23
Navi 21
Release
May 13 2019
May 10 2022
Ranking
#757
#25

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.