
Radeon 3100

Radeon X1650 GTO
Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 GTO Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 GTO FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 GTO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 3100
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 335W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon X1650 GTO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Radeon X1650 GTO
2022Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon 3100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon X1650 GTO is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌570% higher power demand at 335W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 GTO Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 3100
The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

Radeon X1650 GTO
The Radeon X1650 GTO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 75 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 3100 scores 74 and the Radeon X1650 GTO reaches 75 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1650 GTO uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3100) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1650 GTO). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1650 GTO). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 2324 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 74 | 75+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 5120+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 23.8 TFLOPS+1809% |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 2324 MHz+91% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 32 | 320+900% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB+669% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 3100 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 GTO. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon 3100) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the Radeon X1650 GTO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 3100 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1650 GTO's 335W — a 148.1% difference. The Radeon 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3100) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 GTO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-85% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5+650% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon 3100 came in at $199, while the Radeon X1650 GTO launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 GTO was 24.6% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Radeon 3100) vs 0.5 (Radeon X1650 GTO) — the Radeon X1650 GTO offers 25% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 GTO (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 3100 | Radeon X1650 GTO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $150-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 0.5+25% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #757 | #25 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














