Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 3100

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon X1650 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon X1650 SE

2023

Why buy it

✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1650 SE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 3100 instead at 74 vs 71, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1650 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 3100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon 3100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1650 SE has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 3100 vs Radeon X1650 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 3100

The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

Radeon X1650 SE

The Radeon X1650 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 71 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 3100 scores 74 and the Radeon X1650 SE reaches 71 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon X1650 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3100) vs 2,560 (Radeon X1650 SE). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 2581 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 3100	Radeon X1650 SE
G3D Mark Score	74+4%	71
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	512	2560+400%
Boost Clock	1218 MHz	2581 MHz+112%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	160+400%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 3100	Radeon X1650 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 3100 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1650 SE.

Feature	Radeon 3100	Radeon X1650 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 3100 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1650 SE's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3100) vs 350W (Radeon X1650 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 3100	Radeon X1650 SE
TDP	50W-80%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	1.5+400%	0.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 3100 came in at $199, while the Radeon X1650 SE launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon X1650 SE was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (Radeon 3100) vs Infinity (Radeon X1650 SE) — the Radeon X1650 SE offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1650 SE (2023 vs 2019).

Feature	Radeon 3100	Radeon X1650 SE
MSRP	$199	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	Infinity
Codename	Polaris 23	Navi 22
Release	May 13 2019	October 17 2023
Ranking	#757	#92

Search Radeon 3100 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1650 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.