GeForce 8400
VS
Radeon 3100

GeForce 8400 vs Radeon 3100

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 3100

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400 is positioned at rank 657 and the Radeon 3100 is on rank 727, so the GeForce 8400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400

#647
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
6032%
#649
5468%
#650
5453%
#654
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
4959%
#655
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
4925%
#657
GeForce 8400
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
100%
#658
99%
#659
GeForce 9800M GTS
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
99%
#660
GeForce 8600 GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#661
Radeon HD 2900 GT
MSRP: $170|Avg: $15
96%
#662
Radeon HD 8280E
MSRP: $150|Avg: $110
95%
#663
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
93%
#664
Radeon R5 M420
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
93%
#665
Radeon HD 8550G + 8690M Dual
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
92%
#666
Mobility Radeon 4100
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
92%
#667
Radeon HD 2900 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
92%
#668
GeForce 9700M GT
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
91%
#669
GeForce 9300 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
#670
Mobility Radeon X2500
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
#671
GeForce 9800M GTX
MSRP: $300|Avg: $30
84%
#672
Radeon HD 7520G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $57
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3100

#717
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
29343%
#719
26600%
#720
26530%
#724
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
24124%
#725
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
23959%
#727
Radeon 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $30
100%
#728
GeForce 6800 GT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
97%
#729
GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $80
92%
#730
Mobility Radeon X1450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
89%
#731
MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
89%
#732
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
81%
#733
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
81%
#734
GeForce 6200
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
78%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
59%
#737
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
54%
#738
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
54%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
43%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
41%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
27%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 3100 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 3100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 8400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3100.

InsightGeForce 8400Radeon 3100
Performance
Leading raw performance (+9.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-9.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 8400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $30 for the Radeon 3100, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 556.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 8400Radeon 3100
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+556.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400 and Radeon 3100

NVIDIA

GeForce 8400

The GeForce 8400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.

AMD

Radeon 3100

The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 scores 81 versus the Radeon 3100's 74 — the GeForce 8400 leads by 9.5%. The GeForce 8400 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400) vs 512 (Radeon 3100). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 8400Radeon 3100
G3D Mark Score
81+9%
74
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
1.247 TFLOPS+44%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1218 MHz+8%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8400Radeon 3100
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3100) — the GeForce 8400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8400Radeon 3100
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 draws 33W versus the Radeon 3100's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400) vs 350W (Radeon 3100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 8400Radeon 3100
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
Height
106mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
2.5+67%
1.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8400 launched at $45 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Radeon 3100 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce 8400 costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.2 (GeForce 8400) vs 2.5 (Radeon 3100) — the GeForce 8400 offers 548% better value. The Radeon 3100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce 8400Radeon 3100
MSRP
$45-77%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$5-83%
$30
Performance per Dollar
16.2+548%
2.5
Codename
GM108
Polaris 23
Release
March 17 2014
May 13 2019
Ranking
#850
#757