
GeForce 8400 vs Radeon 3100

GeForce 8400
Popular choices:

Radeon 3100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400 is positioned at rank 657 and the Radeon 3100 is on rank 727, so the GeForce 8400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 3100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3100 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 3100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3100.
| Insight | GeForce 8400 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+9.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $30 for the Radeon 3100, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 556.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8400 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+556.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400 and Radeon 3100

GeForce 8400
The GeForce 8400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.

Radeon 3100
The Radeon 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 74 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 scores 81 versus the Radeon 3100's 74 — the GeForce 8400 leads by 9.5%. The GeForce 8400 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400) vs 512 (Radeon 3100). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3100). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 81+9% | 74 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1218 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3100) — the GeForce 8400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 draws 33W versus the Radeon 3100's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 8400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400) vs 350W (Radeon 3100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-34% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 106mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5+67% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8400 launched at $45 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the Radeon 3100 launched at $199 and now averages $30. The GeForce 8400 costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.2 (GeForce 8400) vs 2.5 (Radeon 3100) — the GeForce 8400 offers 548% better value. The Radeon 3100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45-77% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-83% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.2+548% | 2.5 |
| Codename | GM108 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #850 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















