G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 8400 vs Quadro FX 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 8400 vs Quadro FX 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 8400

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $84 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 176.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 370

2008

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 170mm, a 2mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
186.7% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
❌472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (84 vs 81), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 8400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 8400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $84 cheaper on MSRP at $45 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 176.4% (1.8 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 370 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 8400 vs Quadro FX 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400

The GeForce 8400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8400 scores 81 and the Quadro FX 370 reaches 84 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8400 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370).

Feature	GeForce 8400	Quadro FX 370
G3D Mark Score	81	84+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS+39%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	16	80+400%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 8400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 8400	Quadro FX 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 8400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 370 carries 256 MB. GeForce 8400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 370. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 370) — the GeForce 8400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 8400	Quadro FX 370
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 8400	Quadro FX 370
DirectX	10.0	10.0
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	3.3+57%	2.1
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400) vs None (Quadro FX 370). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8400) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 370).

Feature	GeForce 8400	Quadro FX 370
Encoder	No	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	PureVideo 2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8400 draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 8400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce 8400	Quadro FX 370
TDP	33W-83%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	170mm	168mm
Height	106mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	2.5+525%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 8400 came in at $45, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce 8400 was 65.1% cheaper ($84 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (GeForce 8400) vs 0.7 (Quadro FX 370) — the GeForce 8400 offers 157.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400 (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 8400	Quadro FX 370
MSRP	$45-65%	$129
Performance per Dollar	1.8+157%	0.7
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 17 2014	November 11 2008
Ranking	#850	#815

Search GeForce 8400 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.