
GeForce 8400

Radeon HD 2350
GeForce 8400 vs Radeon HD 2350 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400 vs Radeon HD 2350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8400 vs Radeon HD 2350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($45 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($45 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 200W, a 167W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 2350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 2350
2012Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌11.1% HIGHER MSRP$50 MSRPvs$45 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $45 MSRP).
- ❌506.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400 vs Radeon HD 2350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 8400
The GeForce 8400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.

Radeon HD 2350
The Radeon HD 2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 77 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 scores 81 versus the Radeon HD 2350's 77 — the GeForce 8400 leads by 5.2%. The GeForce 8400 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 2350 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 2350). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2350). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 81+5% | 77 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1792+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+232% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1250 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 112+600% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 448 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 8400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 2350 carries 256 MB. GeForce 8400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2350. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 2350) — the GeForce 8400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 2350's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 8400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2350). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-84% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 106mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5+525% | 0.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400 came in at $45, while the Radeon HD 2350 launched at $50. On MSRP, GeForce 8400 was 10% cheaper ($5 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (GeForce 8400) vs 1.5 (Radeon HD 2350) — the GeForce 8400 offers 20% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 8400 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | Radeon HD 2350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45-10% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.8+20% | 1.5 |
| Codename | GM108 | Tahiti |
| Release | March 17 2014 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #850 | #454 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














