GeForce 8400 vs RADEON X700 PRO
GeForce 8400
Popular choices:
RADEON X700 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8400 is positioned at rank 657 and the RADEON X700 PRO is on rank 358, so the RADEON X700 PRO offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8400
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X700 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X700 PRO is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The RADEON X700 PRO likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X700 PRO.
| Insight | GeForce 8400 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $5 versus $30 for the RADEON X700 PRO, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 539.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8400 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+539.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8400 and RADEON X700 PRO
GeForce 8400
The GeForce 8400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.
RADEON X700 PRO
The RADEON X700 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 27 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1287 MHz to 2245 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 76 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400 scores 81 versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 76 — the GeForce 8400 leads by 6.6%. The GeForce 8400 is built on Maxwell while the RADEON X700 PRO uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400) vs 5,120 (RADEON X700 PRO). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400) vs 45.98 TFLOPS (RADEON X700 PRO). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2245 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 81+7% | 76 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 5120+1233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 45.98 TFLOPS+5227% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 2245 MHz+100% |
| ROPs | 8 | 160+1900% |
| TMUs | 16 | 320+1900% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 2.5 MB+1216% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X700 PRO has 256 MB. The GeForce 8400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400) vs 6 MB (RADEON X700 PRO) — the RADEON X700 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400) vs 9_0b (RADEON X700 PRO). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0+11% | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400 draws 33W versus the RADEON X700 PRO's 260W — a 154.9% difference. The GeForce 8400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400) vs 350W (RADEON X700 PRO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 170mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-87% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 170mm | 170mm |
| Height | 106mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.5+733% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8400 launched at $45 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the RADEON X700 PRO launched at $179 and now averages $30. The GeForce 8400 costs 83.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.2 (GeForce 8400) vs 2.5 (RADEON X700 PRO) — the GeForce 8400 offers 548% better value. The RADEON X700 PRO is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400 | RADEON X700 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $45-75% | $179 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-83% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.2+548% | 2.5 |
| Codename | GM108 | Navi 31 |
| Release | March 17 2014 | July 27 2023 |
| Ranking | #850 | #29 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8400 and RADEON X700 PRO
