GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro FX 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 370

#358

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

22728%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

100%

#374

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

94%

#375

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

94%

#376

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

94%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

92%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

89%

#379

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

86%

#380

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

86%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

82%

#382

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

82%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

72%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

68%

#385

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

66%

#386

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

66%

#387

Tesla M2070

MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50

65%

#388

GRID V100D-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

65%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 370 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9267.9% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 370.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 370
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+9267.9%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-9267.9%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $500 for the Quadro FX 370, it costs 85% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 62352.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 370
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+62352.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 370 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro FX 370

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro FX 370

The Quadro FX 370 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 84 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro FX 370's 84 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 9267.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro FX 370 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 240 (Quadro FX 370). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 370).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 370
G3D Mark Score	7,869+9268%	84
Architecture	Turing	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	896+273%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+380%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	80+43%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 370
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 370 has 256 MB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 370) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 370
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+1500%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.0 (Quadro FX 370). Vulkan: 1.4 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 370
DirectX	12+20%	10.0
Vulkan	1.4	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+119%	2.1
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs None (Quadro FX 370). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo 2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 370).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 370
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	None
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo 2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro FX 370's 189W — a 86.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro FX 370). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro FX 370
TDP	75W-60%	189W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+26125%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $75, while the Quadro FX 370 launched at $129 and now averages $500. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 85% less ($425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 370) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 52350% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).