GeForce FX Go5700 vs GeForce Go 7300
GeForce FX Go5700
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 7300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX Go5700 is positioned at rank 296 and the GeForce Go 7300 is on rank 121, so the GeForce Go 7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5700
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX Go5700.
| Insight | GeForce FX Go5700 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX Go5700 and GeForce Go 7300
GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.
GeForce Go 7300
The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 and the GeForce Go 7300 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the GeForce Go 7300 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7300). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 52+2% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+84% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+88% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+2900% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 7300) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs No (GeForce Go 7300). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VPE 3.0 | No |
| Decoder | VPE 3.0 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the GeForce Go 7300's 64W — a 109.5% difference. The GeForce Go 7300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7300). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 64W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.8+300% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX Go5700 and GeForce Go 7300
