GeForce FX Go5700 vs GeForce Go 7300

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5700

2010Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7300

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce FX Go5700 vs GeForce Go 7300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs GeForce Go 7300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs GeForce Go 7300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5700

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 242.2% higher power demand at 219W vs 64W.

GeForce Go 7300

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 64W instead of 219W, a 155W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (52 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX Go5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce Go 7300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX Go5700 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs GeForce Go 7300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5700

The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7300

The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 and the GeForce Go 7300 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the GeForce Go 7300 uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7300). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700GeForce Go 7300
G3D Mark Score
51
52+2%
Architecture
Rankine
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480+25%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS+84%
0.7626 TFLOPS
ROPs
40+150%
16
TMUs
60+88%
32
L1 Cache
960 KB+2900%
32 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB+150%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700GeForce Go 7300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5700 and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7300. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 7300) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700GeForce Go 7300
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
640 KB+150%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700GeForce Go 7300
DirectX
9.0a
9.0c
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs No (GeForce Go 7300). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700GeForce Go 7300
Encoder
VPE 3.0
No
Decoder
VPE 3.0
PureVideo
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the GeForce Go 7300's 64W — a 109.5% difference. The GeForce Go 7300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7300). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700GeForce Go 7300
TDP
219W
64W-71%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.8+300%