
GeForce FX Go5700

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
GeForce FX Go5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX Go5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce FX Go5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX Go5700
2010Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 60).
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌630% higher power demand at 219W vs 30W.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
2009Why buy it
- ✅+17.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 219W, a 189W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX Go5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leads by 17.6%. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 60+18% |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800 ×2+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+60% | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 60+50% | 40 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+500% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX Go5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5700 and 64-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VPE 3.0 | — |
| Decoder | VPE 3.0 | — |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 151.8% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 2.0+900% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce FX Go5700 (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Codename | GF110 | M98 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #497 | #818 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














