GeForce FX Go5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
GeForce FX Go5700
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX Go5700 is positioned at rank 296 and the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is on rank 685, so the GeForce FX Go5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5700
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX Go5700.
| Insight | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-17.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+17.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX Go5700 and MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leads by 17.6%. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 60+18% |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800 ×2+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+60% | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 60+50% | 40 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+500% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VPE 3.0 | — |
| Decoder | VPE 3.0 | — |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 151.8% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 2.0+900% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX Go5700 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GF110 | M98 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #497 | #818 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX Go5700 and MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
