GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce FX Go5700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce FX Go5700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce FX Go5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

2011

Why buy it

✅+15.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 116W instead of 219W, a 103W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce FX Go5700

2010

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 59).
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌88.8% higher power demand at 219W vs 116W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 15.7% in PassMark G3D (59 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GeForce FX Go5700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 59 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce FX Go5700

The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra scores 59 versus the GeForce FX Go5700's 51 — the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra leads by 15.7%. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce FX Go5700 uses Rankine, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 480 (GeForce FX Go5700). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce FX Go5700
G3D Mark Score	59+16%	51
Architecture	Rankine	Rankine
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	480+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6912 TFLOPS	1.405 TFLOPS+103%
ROPs	24	40+67%
TMUs	32	60+88%
L1 Cache	256 KB	960 KB+275%
L2 Cache	384 KB	640 KB+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce FX Go5700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX Go5700 carries 512 MB. GeForce FX Go5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5700. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce FX Go5700
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB	640 KB+67%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce FX Go5700
DirectX	9.0a	9.0a
OpenGL	1.5	2.1+40%
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra draws 116W versus the GeForce FX Go5700's 219W — a 61.5% difference. The GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5950 Ultra) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce FX Go5700
TDP	116W-47%	219W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	0.5+150%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce FX 5950 Ultra (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce FX 5950 Ultra	GeForce FX Go5700
MSRP	$0	—
Codename	GF116	GF110
Release	March 15 2011	December 7 2010
Ranking	#761	#497

Search GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on Amazon

Search GeForce FX Go5700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.