GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1050

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5700

2010Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1050

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1050 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1050 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5700

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 298.2% higher power demand at 219W vs 55W.

Radeon X1050

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 55W instead of 219W, a 164W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX Go5700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (51 vs 49), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1050 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX Go5700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce FX Go5700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1050 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5700

The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

Radeon X1050

The Radeon X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 and the Radeon X1050 reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1050 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1050). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon X1050).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1050
G3D Mark Score
51+4%
49
Architecture
Rankine
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
40 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
480
2048+327%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS
11.47 TFLOPS+716%
ROPs
40
64+60%
TMUs
60
128+113%
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
8 MB+1170%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX Go5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1050 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1050
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX Go5700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1050 carries 256 MB. GeForce FX Go5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5700 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1050. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 8 MB (Radeon X1050) — the Radeon X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1050
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
8 MB+1170%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9_0b (Radeon X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1050
DirectX
9.0a
9_0b
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the Radeon X1050's 55W — a 119.7% difference. The Radeon X1050 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (Radeon X1050). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1050
TDP
219W
55W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.9+350%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1050 (2025 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1050
MSRP
$0
Codename
GF110
Strix Halo
Release
December 7 2010
January 6 2025
Ranking
#497
#126

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.