GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1300

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5700

2010Core: 732 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon X1300

2020Core: 1327 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5700

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 58).
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 119% higher power demand at 219W vs 100W.

Radeon X1300

2020

Why buy it

  • +13.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce FX Go5700 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1300 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 100W instead of 219W, a 119W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.7% in PassMark G3D (58 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5700

The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

Radeon X1300

The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 versus the Radeon X1300's 58 — the Radeon X1300 leads by 13.7%. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1300
G3D Mark Score
51
58+14%
Architecture
Rankine
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
480
1408+193%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS+230%
ROPs
40+25%
32
TMUs
60
88+47%
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
1.5 MB+138%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX Go5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX Go5700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1300 carries 256 MB. GeForce FX Go5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5700 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1300. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1300
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.63 MB
1.5 MB+138%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1300
DirectX
9.0a
9_0c
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs Avivo (Radeon X1300). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (Radeon X1300).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1300
Encoder
VPE 3.0
Avivo
Decoder
VPE 3.0
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 74.6% difference. The Radeon X1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1300
TDP
219W
100W-54%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.6+200%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1300 (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1300
MSRP
$100
Codename
GF110
Navi 14
Release
December 7 2010
May 28 2020
Ranking
#497
#336

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.