
GeForce FX Go5700

Radeon X1300
GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX Go5700
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (51 vs 58).
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌119% higher power demand at 219W vs 100W.
Radeon X1300
2020Why buy it
- ✅+13.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce FX Go5700 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1300 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 219W, a 119W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon X1300
The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 versus the Radeon X1300's 58 — the Radeon X1300 leads by 13.7%. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 1,408 (Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 58+14% |
| Architecture | Rankine | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1408+193% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+230% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 88+47% |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1.5 MB+138% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX Go5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX Go5700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1300 carries 256 MB. GeForce FX Go5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5700 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1300. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 1.5 MB+138% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs Avivo (Radeon X1300). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (Radeon X1300).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VPE 3.0 | Avivo |
| Decoder | VPE 3.0 | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the Radeon X1300's 100W — a 74.6% difference. The Radeon X1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (Radeon X1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 100W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.6+200% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon X1300 (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Codename | GF110 | Navi 14 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #497 | #336 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














