GeForce FX Go5700 vs RADEON X600 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs RADEON X600 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs RADEON X600 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5700

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌65.9% higher power demand at 219W vs 132W.

RADEON X600 SE

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 132W instead of 219W, a 87W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX Go5700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (51 vs 49), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X600 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X600 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce FX Go5700 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs RADEON X600 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX Go5700

The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.

RADEON X600 SE

The RADEON X600 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 and the RADEON X600 SE reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the RADEON X600 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 1,792 (RADEON X600 SE). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 SE).

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	RADEON X600 SE
G3D Mark Score	51+4%	49
Architecture	Rankine	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	480	1792+273%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS	8.942 TFLOPS+536%
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	60	112+87%
L1 Cache	960 KB+88%	512 KB
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX Go5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON X600 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	RADEON X600 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5700 and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 SE. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 2 MB (RADEON X600 SE) — the RADEON X600 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	RADEON X600 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the RADEON X600 SE's 132W — a 49.6% difference. The RADEON X600 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (RADEON X600 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	RADEON X600 SE
TDP	219W	132W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.4+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON X600 SE (2023 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce FX Go5700	RADEON X600 SE
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	GF110	Navi 23
Release	December 7 2010	December 8 2023
Ranking	#497	#176

Search GeForce FX Go5700 on Amazon

Search RADEON X600 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.