GeForce FX Go5700 vs RADEON X600 SE
GeForce FX Go5700
Popular choices:
RADEON X600 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX Go5700 is positioned at rank 296 and the RADEON X600 SE is on rank 354, so the GeForce FX Go5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5700
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X600 SE is significantly newer (2023 vs 2010). The RADEON X600 SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX Go5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X600 SE.
| Insight | GeForce FX Go5700 | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX Go5700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX Go5700 and RADEON X600 SE
GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.
RADEON X600 SE
The RADEON X600 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 and the RADEON X600 SE reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the RADEON X600 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 1,792 (RADEON X600 SE). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 SE).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51+4% | 49 |
| Architecture | Rankine | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1792+273% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 8.942 TFLOPS+536% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 60 | 112+87% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 2 MB (RADEON X600 SE) — the RADEON X600 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the RADEON X600 SE's 132W — a 49.6% difference. The RADEON X600 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (RADEON X600 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 132W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.4+100% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600 SE is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | RADEON X600 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $5 |
| Codename | GF110 | Navi 23 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | December 8 2023 |
| Ranking | #497 | #176 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX Go5700 and RADEON X600 SE
