GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1600

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5700

2010Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1600

2020Boost: 2105 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX Go5700

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 219W instead of 255W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon X1600

2020

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce FX Go5700 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 16.4% higher power demand at 255W vs 219W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX Go5700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (51 vs 49), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce FX Go5700 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX Go5700

The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

Radeon X1600

The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 and the Radeon X1600 reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1600
G3D Mark Score
51+4%
49
Architecture
Rankine
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
480
4608+860%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS
19.4 TFLOPS+1281%
ROPs
40
64+60%
TMUs
60
288+380%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX Go5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX Go5700 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1600
DirectX
9.0a
9_0c
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs Avivo (Radeon X1600). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs Avivo.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1600
Encoder
VPE 3.0
Avivo
Decoder
VPE 3.0
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 15.2% difference. The GeForce FX Go5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1600
TDP
219W-14%
255W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce FX Go5700Radeon X1600
MSRP
$199
Codename
GF110
Navi 21
Release
December 7 2010
October 28 2020
Ranking
#497
#34

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.