GeForce FX Go5700 vs Radeon Xpress 1300
GeForce FX Go5700
Popular choices:
Radeon Xpress 1300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce FX Go5700 is positioned at rank #296 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5700
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Xpress 1300 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The Radeon Xpress 1300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Xpress 1300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX Go5700.
| Insight | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Xpress 1300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX Go5700 and Radeon Xpress 1300
GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.
Radeon Xpress 1300
The Radeon Xpress 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 and the Radeon Xpress 1300 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the Radeon Xpress 1300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 52+2% |
| Architecture | Rankine | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 1280+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 4.224 TFLOPS+201% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 80+33% |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300) — the Radeon Xpress 1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 2 MB+217% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9.0c (Radeon Xpress 1300). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VPE 3.0 | None |
| Decoder | VPE 3.0 | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300's 85W — a 88.2% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 85W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.6+200% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Xpress 1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | Radeon Xpress 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | GF110 | Navi 14 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #497 | #351 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX Go5700 and Radeon Xpress 1300
