GeForce Go 7300 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2300

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7300

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

2010Core: 700 MHz

GeForce Go 7300 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7300 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7300

2014

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 28% higher power demand at 64W vs 50W.

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 64W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7300 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (52 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 7300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 2300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7300 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7300 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7300

The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7300 scores 52 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 reaches 51 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7300 is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7300) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2300).

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Mobility Radeon HD 2300
G3D Mark Score
52+2%
51
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+47%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
80 KB+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7300 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7300 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2300.

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Mobility Radeon HD 2300
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Mobility Radeon HD 2300
DirectX
9.0c
9.0c
OpenGL
2.1+5%
2.0
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7300 draws 64W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2300's 50W — a 24.6% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7300) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Mobility Radeon HD 2300
TDP
64W
50W-22%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.8
1.0+25%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7300 (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Mobility Radeon HD 2300
MSRP
$100
Codename
GK107
Broadway
Release
May 29 2014
January 7 2010
Ranking
#777
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.