
GeForce 6600 LE
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 7300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6600 LE is positioned at rank 319 and the GeForce Go 7300 is on rank 121, so the GeForce Go 7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600 LE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6600 LE.
| Insight | GeForce 6600 LE | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6600 LE and GeForce Go 7300

GeForce 6600 LE
The GeForce 6600 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 888 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

GeForce Go 7300
The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 6600 LE scores 51 and the GeForce Go 7300 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6600 LE is built on Kepler while the GeForce Go 7300 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7300). Raw compute: 2.046 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 52+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+200% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.046 TFLOPS+168% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+200% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6600 LE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7300 has 512 MB. The GeForce Go 7300 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 256 KB (GeForce Go 7300) — the GeForce 6600 LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.1+5% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6600 LE draws 130W versus the GeForce Go 7300's 64W — a 68% difference. The GeForce Go 7300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7300). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 180mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 64W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 180mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.8+100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | GeForce Go 7300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | GK107 |
| Release | August 22 2012 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #799 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















