
GeForce 6600 LE vs Radeon 2100

GeForce 6600 LE
Popular choices:

Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 6600 LE is positioned at rank 319 and the Radeon 2100 is on rank 725, so the GeForce 6600 LE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6600 LE
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 2100 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Radeon 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6600 LE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 17.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6600 LE.
| Insight | GeForce 6600 LE | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-17.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+17.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 6600 LE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $49 for the Radeon 2100, it costs 39% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 38.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 6600 LE | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+38.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6600 LE and Radeon 2100

GeForce 6600 LE
The GeForce 6600 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 888 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6600 LE scores 51 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Radeon 2100 leads by 17.6%. The GeForce 6600 LE is built on Kepler while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 2.046 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100). Boost clocks: 888 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51 | 60+18% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+200% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.046 TFLOPS+160% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 888 MHz | 1024 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 6600 LE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 has 512 MB. The Radeon 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce 6600 LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 2.0 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6600 LE draws 130W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 50W-62% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 180mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 1.2+200% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 6600 LE launched at $30 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $49. The GeForce 6600 LE costs 38.8% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.7 (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 1.2 (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce 6600 LE offers 41.7% better value. The Radeon 2100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 6600 LE | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $30-80% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-39% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7+42% | 1.2 |
| Codename | GK104 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | August 22 2012 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #799 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















