GeForce 6600 LE vs RADEON E2400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 6600 LE vs RADEON E2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 6600 LE vs RADEON E2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 6600 LE

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 226.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.

RADEON E2400

2017

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
233.3% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON E2400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (52 vs 51), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 6600 LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 6600 LE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 226.9% (1.7 vs 0.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. RADEON E2400 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 6600 LE vs RADEON E2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6600 LE

The GeForce 6600 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 823 MHz to 888 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

RADEON E2400

The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 6600 LE scores 51 and the RADEON E2400 reaches 52 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 6600 LE is built on Kepler while the RADEON E2400 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 384 (RADEON E2400). Raw compute: 2.046 TFLOPS (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400). Boost clocks: 888 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 6600 LE	RADEON E2400
G3D Mark Score	51	52+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1152+200%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.046 TFLOPS+125%	0.9085 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	888 MHz	1124 MHz+27%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	96+300%	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 6600 LE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON E2400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 6600 LE	RADEON E2400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 6600 LE has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON E2400 carries 512 MB. RADEON E2400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6600 LE and 64-bit on the RADEON E2400.

Feature	GeForce 6600 LE	RADEON E2400
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6600 LE draws 130W versus the RADEON E2400's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 350W (RADEON E2400). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce 6600 LE	RADEON E2400
TDP	130W	50W-62%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	180mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Perf/Watt	0.4	1.0+150%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 6600 LE came in at $30, while the RADEON E2400 launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 6600 LE was 70% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (GeForce 6600 LE) vs 0.5 (RADEON E2400) — the GeForce 6600 LE offers 240% better value. The newer card here is RADEON E2400 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce 6600 LE	RADEON E2400
MSRP	$30-70%	$100
Performance per Dollar	1.7+240%	0.5
Codename	GK104	Lexa
Release	August 22 2012	April 20 2017
Ranking	#799	#773

Search GeForce 6600 LE on Amazon

Search RADEON E2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.