GeForce Go 7300 vs Radeon 2100

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7300

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 2100

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 7300 vs Radeon 2100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7300 vs Radeon 2100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7300 vs Radeon 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7300

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (52 vs 60).
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 28% higher power demand at 64W vs 50W.

Radeon 2100

2019

Why buy it

  • +15.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • GeForce Go 7300 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 64W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 2100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 15.4% in PassMark G3D (60 vs 52), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 2100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 7300 vs Radeon 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7300

The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7300 scores 52 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Radeon 2100 leads by 15.4%. The GeForce Go 7300 is built on Kepler while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7300) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Radeon 2100
G3D Mark Score
52
60+15%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
0.7864 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
96 KB+200%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7300 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 2100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Radeon 2100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7300 and 64-bit on the Radeon 2100. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce Go 7300) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce Go 7300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Radeon 2100
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Radeon 2100
DirectX
9.0c
9.0b
OpenGL
2.1+5%
2.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7300) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: PureVideo vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Radeon 2100
Encoder
No
Avivo
Decoder
PureVideo
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7300 draws 64W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 24.6% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7300) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Radeon 2100
TDP
64W
50W-22%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.8
1.2+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce Go 7300Radeon 2100
MSRP
$149
Codename
GK107
Polaris 24
Release
May 29 2014
May 13 2019
Ranking
#777
#898

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.