GeForce Go 7300 vs Radeon 2100
GeForce Go 7300
Popular choices:
Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7300 is positioned at rank 121 and the Radeon 2100 is on rank 725, so the GeForce Go 7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7300
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 2100 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7300.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 2100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7300 and Radeon 2100
GeForce Go 7300
The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7300 scores 52 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Radeon 2100 leads by 15.4%. The GeForce Go 7300 is built on Kepler while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7300) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 52 | 60+15% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce Go 7300) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce Go 7300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7300) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: PureVideo vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7300 draws 64W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 24.6% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7300) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 50W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 1.2+50% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 2100 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | GK107 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #777 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce Go 7300 and Radeon 2100
