
GeForce Go 7300 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

GeForce Go 7300
Popular choices:

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7300 is positioned at rank 121 and the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is on rank 685, so the GeForce Go 7300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7300
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7300.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7300 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-15.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+15.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7300 and MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

GeForce Go 7300
The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7300 scores 52 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leads by 15.4%. The GeForce Go 7300 is built on Kepler while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7300) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 52 | 60+15% |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800 ×2+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2+15% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40 ×2+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300) vs 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo | — |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7300 draws 64W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 72.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7300) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 30W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.8 | 2.0+150% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7300 | MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Codename | GK107 | M98 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #777 | #818 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















