GeForce Go 7300 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7300 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7300 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7300

2014

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (52 vs 60).
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌113.3% higher power demand at 64W vs 30W.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

2009

Why buy it

✅+15.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 64W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 15.4% in PassMark G3D (60 vs 52), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce Go 7300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2009. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7300 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7300 vs MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7300

The GeForce Go 7300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $89.

MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL

The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7300 scores 52 versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 60 — the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leads by 15.4%. The GeForce Go 7300 is built on Kepler while the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7300) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7300) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).

Feature	GeForce Go 7300	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
G3D Mark Score	52	60+15%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384	800 ×2+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	0.88 TFLOPS ×2+15%
ROPs	16	16 ×2
TMUs	32	40 ×2+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	160 KB+400%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7300 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce Go 7300	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7300 and 64-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL.

Feature	GeForce Go 7300	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7300) vs 9_0b (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce Go 7300	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
DirectX	9.0c	9_0b
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7300) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL).

Feature	GeForce Go 7300	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
Encoder	No	—
Decoder	PureVideo	—
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7300 draws 64W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL's 30W — a 72.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7300) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce Go 7300	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
TDP	64W	30W-53%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.8	2.0+150%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7300 (2014 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce Go 7300	MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP	—	$49
Codename	GK107	M98
Release	May 29 2014	January 9 2009
Ranking	#777	#818

Search GeForce Go 7300 on Amazon

Search MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.