A4-9120 vs Celeron G470

A4-9120 vs Celeron G470 Performance Spectrum

A4-9120

2 / 2

1,222

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G470

1 / 2

1,225

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-9120 vs Celeron G470 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-9120 vs Celeron G470: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-9120

2017

Why buy it

✅+16.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,222 vs 1,225).

Celeron G470

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 350).
❌Launch MSRP is still $35 MSRP, while A4-9120 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-9120 better than Celeron G470?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-9120 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G470 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-9120 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-9120 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $35 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G470 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (35.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-9120 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-9120 vs Celeron G470 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-9120

The A4-9120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,222 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron G470

The Celeron G470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,225 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-9120 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G470 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the A4-9120 has 1 more core. The A4-9120 is built on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the A4-9120 scores 1,222 against the Celeron G470's 1,225 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G470. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 300, a 15.4% lead for the A4-9120 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A4-9120	Celeron G470
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	1.5 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	1,222	1,225
Geekbench 6 Single	350+17%	300

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-9120 uses the BGA socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G470 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the A4-9120 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G470 — the A4-9120 supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G470 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-9120) vs 2 (Celeron G470). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-9120) vs 16 (Celeron G470) — the Celeron G470 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-9120	Celeron G470
Socket	BGA	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+100%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-9120) vs VT-x (Celeron G470). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R3 (A4-9120) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G470) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-9120 targets Entry Laptop, Celeron G470 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-9120 rivals Celeron N3350; Celeron G470 rivals Pentium G630.