A6-3400M
VS
Pentium Dual Core T4300

A6-3400M vs Pentium Dual Core T4300

AMD

A6-3400M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3400M is positioned at rank 869 and the Pentium Dual Core T4300 is on rank 1127, so the A6-3400M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3400M

#857
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1440%
#858
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1419%
#859
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1302%
#860
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1296%
#861
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1284%
#863
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1240%
#864
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1189%
#865
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1187%
#866
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1156%
#869
A6-3400M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
99%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#882
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T4300

#1115
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3574%
#1116
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3521%
#1117
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3233%
#1118
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3218%
#1119
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3189%
#1121
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3079%
#1122
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2952%
#1123
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2948%
#1124
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2868%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
100%
#1128
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
100%
#1129
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
100%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-3400M leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium Dual Core T4300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA6-3400MPentium Dual Core T4300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-3400MPentium Dual Core T4300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-3400M and Pentium Dual Core T4300

AMD

A6-3400M

The A6-3400M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,223 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A6-3400M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3400M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the A6-3400M versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 — a 9.1% clock advantage for the A6-3400M (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A6-3400M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3400M scores 1,223 against the Pentium Dual Core T4300's 1,232 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T4300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA6-3400MPentium Dual Core T4300
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz+10%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
2.1 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,223
1,232
Geekbench 6 Single
218
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3400M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3400M) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T4300) — the A6-3400M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA6-3400MPentium Dual Core T4300
Socket
FS1
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3400M) vs No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4300). The A6-3400M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6520G), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3400M targets Budget Laptop, Pentium Dual Core T4300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A6-3400M rivals Core i3-2310M.

FeatureA6-3400MPentium Dual Core T4300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6520G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
No VT-x
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Mobile