A6-3400M
VS
Ryzen 5 5600

A6-3400M vs Ryzen 5 5600

AMD

A6-3400M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The A6-3400M is positioned at rank #869 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3400M

#857
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1440%
#858
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1419%
#859
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1302%
#860
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1296%
#861
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1284%
#863
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1240%
#864
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1189%
#865
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1187%
#866
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1156%
#869
A6-3400M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#873
Celeron M 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
100%
#877
Microsoft SQ1
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
99%
#879
Core i5-6440HQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
99%
#882
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#884
Athlon II N330
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 5600

#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
135%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
123%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
123%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
121%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
118%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
116%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
116%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
115%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
112%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
110%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
109%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
108%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
107%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
103%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
101%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
100%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
100%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
98%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
97%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
97%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
97%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
95%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
95%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
94%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
93%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
93%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
93%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
90%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
88%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
87%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 5 5600 (2022) utilizes 7 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-3400MRyzen 5 5600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($115)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (2020−2025) / 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A6-3400M (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-3400MRyzen 5 5600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($115)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-3400M and Ryzen 5 5600

AMD

A6-3400M

The A6-3400M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,223 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Ryzen 5 5600

The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The A6-3400M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 5600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the A6-3400M versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 — a 62.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The A6-3400M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3400M scores 1,223 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 — a 178.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 218 vs 2,052, a 161.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3400M vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureA6-3400MRyzen 5 5600
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
4.4 GHz+91%
Base Clock
1.4 GHz
3.5 GHz+150%
L3 Cache
0 kB
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm
7 nm-78%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
1,223
21,550+1662%
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,077
Geekbench 6 Single
218
2,052+841%
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3400M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A6-3400M versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 — the Ryzen 5 5600 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3400M) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) — the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA6-3400MRyzen 5 5600
Socket
FS1
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A6-3400M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6520G), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3400M targets Budget Laptop, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3400M rivals Core i3-2310M.

FeatureA6-3400MRyzen 5 5600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6520G
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Desktop