A6-3420M
VS
Celeron M 743

A6-3420M vs Celeron M 743

AMD

A6-3420M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron M 743

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3420M is positioned at rank 837 and the Celeron M 743 is on rank 1029, so the A6-3420M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3420M

#824
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1344%
#825
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1324%
#826
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1216%
#827
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1210%
#828
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1199%
#830
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1158%
#831
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1110%
#832
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1109%
#833
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1079%
#836
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#837
A6-3420M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#851
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 743

#1017
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2372%
#1018
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2337%
#1019
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2146%
#1020
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2136%
#1021
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2116%
#1023
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2044%
#1024
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1960%
#1025
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1956%
#1026
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1904%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
99%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
96%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
95%
#1042
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
94%
#1043
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
94%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-3420M leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron M 743 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA6-3420MCeleron M 743
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-3420MCeleron M 743
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-3420M and Celeron M 743

AMD

A6-3420M

The A6-3420M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,310 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron M 743

The Celeron M 743 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA965. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,324 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The A6-3420M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 743 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A6-3420M has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-3420M versus 1.3 GHz on the Celeron M 743 — a 59.5% clock advantage for the A6-3420M. The A6-3420M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 743 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3420M scores 1,310 against the Celeron M 743's 1,324 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron M 743.

FeatureA6-3420MCeleron M 743
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+300%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+85%
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,310
1,324+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
234
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3420M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 743 uses BGA965 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA6-3420MCeleron M 743
Socket
FS1
BGA965
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-3420M) / not specified (Celeron M 743). The A6-3420M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6520G), while the Celeron M 743 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3420M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-3420M rivals Core i3-2330M.

FeatureA6-3420MCeleron M 743
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6520G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop