A6-5400K vs Celeron 847

A6-5400K vs Celeron 847 Performance Spectrum

A6-5400K

2 / 2

1,279

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 847

2 / 2

1,270

0.0%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5400K vs Celeron 847 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5400K vs Celeron 847: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5400K

2012

Why buy it

✅+99% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron 847.

Trade-offs

❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.

Celeron 847

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (196 vs 390).
❌Lower PassMark (1,270 vs 1,279).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while A6-5400K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-5400K.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5400K better than Celeron 847?

Yes. A6-5400K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-5400K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5400K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5400K is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A6-5400K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 847 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5400K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-5400K vs Celeron 847 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5400K

The A6-5400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,279 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-5400K and Celeron 847 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-5400K versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 — a 110.2% clock advantage for the A6-5400K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A6-5400K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 847 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5400K scores 1,279 against the Celeron 847's 1,270 — a 0.7% lead for the A6-5400K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 390 vs 196, a 66.2% lead for the A6-5400K that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5400K vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847.

Feature	A6-5400K	Celeron 847
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+245%	1.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+227%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,279	1,270
Geekbench 6 Single	390+99%	196
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	354

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5400K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 847 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-5400K versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 847 — the A6-5400K supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-5400K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (A6-5400K) and HM65,HM67 (Celeron 847).

Feature	A6-5400K	Celeron 847
Socket	FM2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-5400K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5400K) vs VT-x (Celeron 847). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7540D (A6-5400K) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 847) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5400K targets Budget Desktop, Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-5400K rivals Pentium G2120; Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.