CPU
GPU
A6-5400K
Celeron E3500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-5400K is positioned at rank 765 and the Celeron E3500 is on rank 778, so the A6-5400K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-5400K
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-5400K | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-5400K | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-5400K and Celeron E3500
A6-5400K
The A6-5400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,279 points. Launch price was $70.
Celeron E3500
The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.
Processing Power
Both the A6-5400K and Celeron E3500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-5400K versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron E3500 — a 33.8% clock advantage for the A6-5400K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A6-5400K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron E3500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5400K scores 1,279 against the Celeron E3500's 1,290 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron E3500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 390 vs 347, a 11.7% lead for the A6-5400K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A6-5400K | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+41% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,279 | 1,290 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 390+12% | 347 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 624 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-5400K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E3500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The A6-5400K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5400K) vs 0 (Celeron E3500) — the A6-5400K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (A6-5400K) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3500).
| Feature | A6-5400K | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the A6-5400K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5400K) vs VT-x (Celeron E3500). The A6-5400K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7540D), while the Celeron E3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5400K targets Budget Desktop, Celeron E3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-5400K rivals Pentium G2120; Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.
| Feature | A6-5400K | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7540D | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-5400K and Celeron E3500
