A6-6400B
VS
Celeron 4305U

A6-6400B vs Celeron 4305U

AMD

A6-6400B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron 4305U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-6400B is positioned at rank 655 and the Celeron 4305U is on rank 109, so the Celeron 4305U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-6400B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11888%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11233%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8156%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2457%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1946%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1703%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
975%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
962%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
876%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
876%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
866%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
843%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
831%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
828%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
820%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
100%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
98%
#655
A6-6400B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
100%
#659
Core i5-6600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $35
100%
#660
FX-4350
MSRP: $122|Avg: $140
100%
#661
Core i5-3570T
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
99%
#662
Core i5-6600K
MSRP: $242|Avg: $105
99%
#663
Core i5-4440
MSRP: $184|Avg: $101
99%
#664
Core i3-4370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $41
99%
#665
Core i5-7500T
MSRP: $202|Avg: $130
98%
#666
Core i5-7400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $78
98%
#667
Core i5-4670
MSRP: $213|Avg: $65
98%
#668
Core i5-4570S
MSRP: $195|Avg: $40
98%
#669
Pentium G2010
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4305U

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
97%
#97
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
282%
#98
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
278%
#99
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
255%
#100
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
254%
#101
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
251%
#103
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
243%
#104
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
233%
#105
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
232%
#106
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
226%
#109
Celeron 4305U
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
100%
#110
Celeron J1850
MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A
99%
#114
Core i3-4100M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $99
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 4305U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-6400BCeleron 4305U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A6-6400B (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-6400BCeleron 4305U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-6400B and Celeron 4305U

AMD

A6-6400B

The A6-6400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,573 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron 4305U

The Celeron 4305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,562 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the A6-6400B and Celeron 4305U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A6-6400B versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 4305U — a 60.3% clock advantage for the A6-6400B (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A6-6400B uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 4305U uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-6400B scores 1,573 against the Celeron 4305U's 1,562 — a 0.7% lead for the A6-6400B.

FeatureA6-6400BCeleron 4305U
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+86%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.9 GHz+77%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,573
1,562
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-6400B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 4305U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A6-6400B versus 2133 on the Celeron 4305U — the Celeron 4305U supports 13.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 4305U supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 32 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A6-6400B) and Whiskey Lake-U (Celeron 4305U).

FeatureA6-6400BCeleron 4305U
Socket
FM2
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1866
2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity
32
64+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8470D (A6-6400B) and Intel UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron 4305U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305U targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-6400B rivals Pentium G3220; Celeron 4305U rivals Pentium Gold 5405U.

FeatureA6-6400BCeleron 4305U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8470D
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true
Target Use
Budget