A6-6420K
VS
Celeron G1620

A6-6420K vs Celeron G1620

AMD

A6-6420K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron G1620

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-6420K is positioned at rank 656 and the Celeron G1620 is on rank 590, so the Celeron G1620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-6420K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11907%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11251%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8169%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2461%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1949%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1705%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
977%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
964%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
878%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
878%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
868%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
844%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
833%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
829%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
822%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
100%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
98%
#656
A6-6420K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
100%
#659
Core i5-6600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $35
100%
#660
FX-4350
MSRP: $122|Avg: $140
100%
#661
Core i5-3570T
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
100%
#662
Core i5-6600K
MSRP: $242|Avg: $105
99%
#663
Core i5-4440
MSRP: $184|Avg: $101
99%
#664
Core i3-4370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $41
99%
#665
Core i5-7500T
MSRP: $202|Avg: $130
99%
#666
Core i5-7400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $78
98%
#667
Core i5-4670
MSRP: $213|Avg: $65
98%
#668
Core i5-4570S
MSRP: $195|Avg: $40
98%
#669
Pentium G2010
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
98%
#671
Core i5-6500TE
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1620

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10220%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9657%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7012%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2112%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1673%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1464%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
838%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
827%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
753%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
753%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
745%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
725%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
715%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
712%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
705%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
99%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
100%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
100%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
98%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
98%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
98%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
98%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
98%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
97%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
97%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
96%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-6420K leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G1620 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA6-6420KCeleron G1620
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-6420KCeleron G1620
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-6420K and Celeron G1620

AMD

A6-6420K

The A6-6420K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,571 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron G1620

The Celeron G1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,586 points. Launch price was $208.

Processing Power

Both the A6-6420K and Celeron G1620 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A6-6420K versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1620 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the A6-6420K (base: 4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A6-6420K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G1620 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-6420K scores 1,571 against the Celeron G1620's 1,586 — a 1% lead for the Celeron G1620.

FeatureA6-6420KCeleron G1620
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz+56%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+48%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1024 kB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,571
1,586
Geekbench 6 Single
441
Geekbench 6 Multi
760
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-6420K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1620 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A6-6420K versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1620 — the A6-6420K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A6-6420K) and H77,B75,Z77,H61,P67,Z68 (Celeron G1620).

FeatureA6-6420KCeleron G1620
Socket
FM2
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
1866+62100%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32
32 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-6420K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (A6-6420K) vs VT-x, EPT (Celeron G1620). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8470D (A6-6420K) and Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) (Celeron G1620) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-6420K rivals Pentium G3258; Celeron G1620 rivals Pentium G2030.

FeatureA6-6420KCeleron G1620
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8470D
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Desktop