A8-3500M vs Core 2 Duo E8600
A8-3500M
Core 2 Duo E8600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-3500M is positioned at rank 821 and the Core 2 Duo E8600 is on rank 1050, so the A8-3500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A8-3500M
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A8-3500M | Core 2 Duo E8600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($95) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A8-3500M | Core 2 Duo E8600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($95) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-3500M and Core 2 Duo E8600
A8-3500M
The A8-3500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,391 points. Launch price was $90.
Core 2 Duo E8600
The Core 2 Duo E8600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,378 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The A8-3500M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E8600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3500M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-3500M versus 3.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8600 — a 32.5% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8600 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.33 GHz). The A8-3500M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8600 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3500M scores 1,391 against the Core 2 Duo E8600's 1,378 — a 0.9% lead for the A8-3500M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 231 vs 486, a 71.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A8-3500M | Core 2 Duo E8600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.33 GHz+39% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 3.33 GHz+122% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 6 MB (total)+500% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,391 | 1,378 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 231 | 486+110% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 885 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-3500M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3500M) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E8600) — the A8-3500M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A8-3500M | Core 2 Duo E8600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3500M) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E8600). The A8-3500M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Core 2 Duo E8600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3500M targets Budget Laptop, Core 2 Duo E8600 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-3500M rivals Core i3-2310M; Core 2 Duo E8600 rivals Phenom II X2 550.
| Feature | A8-3500M | Core 2 Duo E8600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6620G | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A8-3500M and Core 2 Duo E8600
