A8-3500M
VS
Core Duo T2300

A8-3500M vs Core Duo T2300

AMD

A8-3500M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2300

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.66 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-3500M is positioned at rank 821 and the Core Duo T2300 is on rank 55, so the Core Duo T2300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3500M

#809
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1266%
#810
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1247%
#811
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1145%
#812
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1140%
#813
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1129%
#815
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1091%
#816
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1046%
#817
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1044%
#818
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1016%
#821
A8-3500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#824
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#825
Pentium P6100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16.39
97%
#827
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
96%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
96%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
95%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2300

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
97%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#43
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
213%
#44
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
209%
#45
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
192%
#46
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
191%
#47
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
190%
#49
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
183%
#50
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
176%
#51
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
175%
#52
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
171%
#55
Core Duo T2300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
95%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-3500M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core Duo T2300 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-3500MCore Duo T2300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-3500MCore Duo T2300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-3500M and Core Duo T2300

AMD

A8-3500M

The A8-3500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,391 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core Duo T2300

The Core Duo T2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,380 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The A8-3500M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core Duo T2300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3500M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-3500M versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Duo T2300 — a 36.5% clock advantage for the A8-3500M (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). The A8-3500M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core Duo T2300 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3500M scores 1,391 against the Core Duo T2300's 1,380 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-3500M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA8-3500MCore Duo T2300
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+45%
1.66 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
1.66 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,391
1,380
Geekbench 6 Single
231
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3500M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Duo T2300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA8-3500MCore Duo T2300
Socket
FS1
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3500M) / not specified (Core Duo T2300). The A8-3500M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Core Duo T2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3500M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3500M rivals Core i3-2310M.

FeatureA8-3500MCore Duo T2300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6620G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop