A8-3500M vs Core i3-2370M

AMD

A8-3500M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-2370M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

A8-3500M vs Core i3-2370M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3500M vs Core i3-2370M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3500M vs Core i3-2370M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3500M

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-2370M

2012

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-3500M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (1,370 vs 1,391).
    • Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while A8-3500M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is A8-3500M better than Core i3-2370M?
    Yes. A8-3500M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, A8-3500M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-3500M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    A8-3500M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-3500M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-2370M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i3-2370M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    A8-3500M vs Core i3-2370M Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    A8-3500M

    The A8-3500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,391 points. Launch price was $90.

    Intel

    Core i3-2370M

    The Core i3-2370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,370 points. Launch price was $225.

    Processing Power

    The A8-3500M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-2370M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3500M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A8-3500M versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-2370M — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A8-3500M uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2370M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3500M scores 1,391 against the Core i3-2370M's 1,370 — a 1.5% lead for the A8-3500M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 231 vs 412, a 56.3% lead for the Core i3-2370M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3500M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2370M.

    FeatureA8-3500MCore i3-2370M
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.4 GHz
    2.4 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.5 GHz
    2.4 GHz+60%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    3 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    256K (per core)+25500%
    Process
    32 nm
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Llano (2011−2012)
    Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
    PassMark
    1,391+2%
    1,370
    Geekbench 6 Single
    231
    412+78%
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    711
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The A8-3500M uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2370M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3500M) vs 16 (Core i3-2370M) — the A8-3500M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

    FeatureA8-3500MCore i3-2370M
    Socket
    FS1
    PGA988
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1333
    DDR3-1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB
    16 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    20+25%
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-3500M) vs VT-x (Core i3-2370M). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 6620G (A8-3500M) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2370M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3500M targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-2370M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3500M rivals Core i3-2310M.

    FeatureA8-3500MCore i3-2370M
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon HD 6620G
    Intel HD Graphics 3000
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Budget Laptop
    Laptop