A8-3550MX vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+

A8-3550MX vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Performance Spectrum

A8-3550MX

4 / 4

1,687

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 64 X2 5600+

2 / 2

1,665

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3550MX vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3550MX vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3550MX

2011

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 89W, a 44W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6620G, while Athlon 64 X2 5600+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,665 vs 1,687).
❌Launch MSRP is still $505 MSRP, while A8-3550MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌97.8% higher power demand at 89W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3550MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-3550MX better than Athlon 64 X2 5600+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is ahead with a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A8-3550MX pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-3550MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-3550MX is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-3550MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $505 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. Athlon 64 X2 5600+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-3550MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3550MX vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3550MX

The A8-3550MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,687 points. Launch price was $90.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+

The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,665 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3550MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3550MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A8-3550MX versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5600+. The A8-3550MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3550MX scores 1,687 against the Athlon 64 X2 5600+'s 1,665 — a 1.3% lead for the A8-3550MX. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A8-3550MX	Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	2.9 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K+51100%
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,687+1%	1,665
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3550MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A8-3550MX versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ — the A8-3550MX supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (A8-3550MX) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5600+) — the A8-3550MX offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A8-3550MX	Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Socket	FS1	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3550MX) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5600+). The A8-3550MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3550MX targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3550MX rivals Core i5-2540M.