A8-3550MX vs Pentium P6300

A8-3550MX vs Pentium P6300 Performance Spectrum

A8-3550MX

4 / 4

1,687

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium P6300

2 / 2

1,685

0.0%

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-3550MX vs Pentium P6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-3550MX vs Pentium P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-3550MX

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6620G, while Pentium P6300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Pentium P6300

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,685 vs 1,687).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A8-3550MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-3550MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-3550MX better than Pentium P6300?

Yes. A8-3550MX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-3550MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-3550MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-3550MX is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-3550MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-3550MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-3550MX vs Pentium P6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-3550MX

The A8-3550MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,687 points. Launch price was $90.

Pentium P6300

The Pentium P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-3550MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium P6300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-3550MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A8-3550MX versus 0.27 GHz on the Pentium P6300 — a 163.6% clock advantage for the A8-3550MX (base: 2 GHz vs 2.27 GHz). The A8-3550MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium P6300 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A8-3550MX scores 1,687 against the Pentium P6300's 1,685 — a 0.1% lead for the A8-3550MX. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-3550MX vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6300.

Feature	A8-3550MX	Pentium P6300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+900%	0.27 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.27 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,687	1,685
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-3550MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium P6300 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-3550MX	Pentium P6300
Socket	FS1	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A8-3550MX) / not specified (Pentium P6300). The A8-3550MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6620G), while the Pentium P6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-3550MX targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-3550MX rivals Core i5-2540M.